That Good Theme, fascinating about it I quickly came to remember the words of Enrique Pichon Rivière when talking to Vicente Zito Lema on "the art and madness" (his book), Vincent asks the Master, to address the issue of racial prejudice. Does the fact, in general prejudice? Pichon, replied: "Behind bias is always envy. Either by the industry, the beauty, the vision of the future or how to face the world with the loved objects of rejection. May be in fact There is an ideological and religious undertone, but the core of this feeling is made up of competition, rivalry and repeat. envy. "
This was one of my first readings in my initial steps in social psychology, where I was interested to inquire into those words that very young had heard people pronounce it so naturally ... and yes, behind value judgments and / 0 of a trial, there is much to analyze, review and understanding necessary to look at others and at ourselves, to understand, to re-ask our own attitudes and those of others, to give us the chance to discuss them to make future modifications and cooperate with others so they can change such attitudes by appealing to the transformation. Well
which we are always thinking Social Psychology the need to revise our learning matrices in displeasure and pleasure produced to meet and deal with this difficult task.
themes are so deep they touch the inner world of subjects mobilizing them, allowing them to think about their own history.
As nothing is accidental, today just thinking about the issue of prejudice when they heard on the T. V a woman with a great solidarity offered by your home to provide assistance to needy children, could only express very angry complaints against children who had their little hands clean and such was his annoyance that the great solidarity in its possession, not rid of the huge biases, is say "these guys do not want to learn, know no rules of conduct and continued disqualifying estigmatizàndoslos, sounding absolutely derogatory and discriminatory to small, when in reality he was facing a case in which the conditions of those children, were of great overcrowding and homelessness. Then, "by merely involves dirty and appeared the sign .......... defense to these children was shown in the media as the most significant that the attitude that they had fed them, morbid message .. "cascotasos .. .. broken glass, painful image", and the kids were left without receiving daily rations ... sorry.
Is to think?
How does one learn if there is one other teaches you? I contained in the learning process? With you and puts you limits?
may not know how it's done and who have no real contribution to because you may not have learned this rule because no one explained the significance of such conduct "wash their hands to eat."
back to the issues of learning matrices. How wonderful to discover that one is involved and begins to understand that the link, the other does and I do. In that together, the other understands and I understand, therefore we see that we can understand different things and then the noise appears and misunderstanding, the heritage of all that is the communication process that flows through all the links where you set up our learning matrices. And in that link which shapes our subjectivity. There is a stage where someone, an adult with an I deployed, developed, with certain ideas, feelings, expectations, desires, needs, providing support that role at that time who has to set his ego. It is undoubtedly in-interrupted sequence of the web of life because they never stop learning. There is always a time when the other brings me, brings me, with me or not, not with me, I said, it gets me, it brings me. And this puts subject matter: that surely is proposed for discussion, the limits. How are the limits? If they get or not? The limits on the parent and child - adult - child. At this point so rapid social, stage of free thought, free will, free, free .... is put into question the need for limits? The limits are a condition of existence for the other. We know that in the beginning of life is a mother-child relationship really close, and how to solve this pegoteooo, how a child is convinced that it is a different subject but is that the adult is the one that sets limits, there someone who knows which is the difference and can show but the other can not learn, a child learns sure if anyone puts limits, but no. The limits are a contradiction that involves contact and difference, can not differentiate who has not been hit.
Join the discussion of ideas 
0 comments:
Post a Comment